Tuesday, June 3, 2014

A DAY IN THE ABUSEMENT PARK (ABRIDGED)
                              
                                    by Neville Raymond



            It was D-Day - the Thursday before Memorial Day, 2014.  Thinking to beat the summer rush, we piled the kids into the car and set out to storm the Magic Kingdom.  Our sons had never been and we looked forward to basking in their pleasure as first-timers.

            At first it looked like just another day at Disneyland.  Some of the iconic rides were down.  Others had glitches that prolonged wait times even further.  It was 'Grad Night', so the mob scene and long lines were near intolerable. The food was overpriced.  Nothing in all this led me to revise my opinion of amusement parks.  

            But then something jolted me awake. 
            Matterhorn. 
            Theme parks like Disneyland have much to offer in the way of innocuous fun.  But there is something about them that we avoid talking about, and it got me thinking that perhaps the 'm' in 'amusement' park should be replaced with a 'b'.  Then we might see them for what they are - 'abusement' parks.

            We all want to keep our children safe - safe from toxic toys, street criminals, schoolyard bullies.  But then we suffer a momentary lapse in judgment.  We take them to a place where they are grabbed by an enraged giant and shaken like a victim of Shaken Baby Syndrome.  They are hurled into a grudge match with gravity where their young bodies are flattened by more G forces than even astronauts endure.  They are jerked and spun around, bounced and twisted as if caught up in the tumble-dry cycle of a mammoth dryer.  They suffer 100-foot drops and precipitous plunges that leave even adults with the bottom falling out of their stomachs.   
            Most of us wouldn’t treat a dog that way.  And here we are treating our children - who just a few short years ago were babies in arms - in this unhinged, deranged, almost berserk way.

             How can we be conscious parents in so many areas of our children’s lives and yet be so unconscious when it comes to this?  How can we be responsible custodians of young lives and yet allow their bodies to be treated with such shocking disregard? Only now are we fathoming the brain injuries that adolescents sustain by recklessly colliding on the football field.  Maybe it’s time to take stock of the bone-jarring, nerve-wracking, brain-crunching violence that children encounter at a place billed as the happiest on earth.   
            Splash Mountain.  Space Mountain.  Matterhorn.

            Matterhorn?  Yes, Matterhorn.  I am a grown man in good health, with no preexisting conditions.  I was stunned by this ride and appalled by how it left me feeling.  
            As a teenager I remembered it as a rather pleasant simulation of a bobsled ride.  Repeated upgrades turned it into a madcap careening through cavernous darkness.  The off-the-charts bouncing and jouncing from the wheels scrambled the brains and slammed the spine.  Many times it looked we were going to fly off the mountain only to be jerked around at the last moment and whipsawed back on track.  What had we let ourselves in for?  My heart went out to my younger son.  I couldn’t reach back to comfort him and my voice was lost in the thunderous din.  By the time the ride screeched to a halt, I didn’t just feel upset.  I felt violated.  Vowing to never go again, I wondered how a body could hope to escape unscathed after repeatedly going through something like that.
           
            Attention-grabbing headlines on roller coasters are reserved for accidental deaths from ride malfunctions.  At issue here is something more insidious.  It is the harm done to children’s fragile bodies when a ride functions perfectly, just the way it is supposed to.  It may not be damage visible to the naked eye.  It is the thousand neurological disturbances that occur when the human organism is strapped into a mechanical device whose sole purpose seems to be to push it to the limits of endurance.  Are we aware of the subtle damage done to brain stems, spines, vital organs?  Forget about obvious symptoms like nausea, headaches and dizzy spells.  Do we test for sub-clinical tears and lesions?  Is anyone monitoring the arrhythmic pattern into which the heart lapses, or the microscopic vessels in the brain that rupture and hemorrhage? 
            No, no one is.  The amusement park industry sees to that.  Its unspoken mission is to foil all legislative efforts at federal oversight.  Even accidents that make the 6 ‘o clock news - of bodies catapulted from seats through a failure of restraint mechanisms or crushed by colliding cars – can't seem to mobilize public opinion in favor of regulation.  Fixed-ride amusement operators have lobbied Congress to remain masters of their domain.  There are no federal guidelines to say that 4-Gs of force is too much – though even trained astronauts are spared that much – or that this accelerative stress point or that level of decelerative strain is pushing it.  It's literally the wild blue sky out there. 

             The Annals of Emergency reported that amusement ride-related brain injury had risen substantially since 1990.  "The acceleration and abrupt changes in direction on a roller coaster may induce uncontrolled rotation of the head with stretching of the cervical vessels and aorta similar to that observed with acute deceleration in a motor vehicle crash."  Tears notably develop in the inner layers of the carotid and vertebral artery from indirect trauma or torsion of the neck.  Blood surging through these tears can cause the inner and middle layers to separate or dissect.  
             From 1996 to 2002 injuries on amusement park rides jumped 60 percent.  According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, more than 10,000 injuries needed emergency room treatment.  The National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke in Bethesda, MD reported that almost 60 people suffered brain trauma after being on thrill rides that operated normally.  Eight died.  And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.
            
            Ten years prior to 2002, reported the New York Times, “there was no such thing as a hypercoaster, a roller coaster that reaches 200 feet or higher. Now, the record is 400 feet. Until a few years ago, roller coasters gained momentum purely by gravity. Now many are catapulted from zero to 70 miles an hour in less than four seconds by motors originally designed to launch rockets.” 
             And here we are, twelve years down the road, and the much-hyped changes in rollercoaster design keep on coming.  What about the corresponding changes in heart rate, blood flow, brain chemistry?  They may pose short and long term harm, but they remain out of sight, out of mind.  We don’t know the incidence of memory loss.  We don’t count how many mini-strokes occur.  We don’t rate the chances of microscopic bleeding in the brain.  Sure we can speculate.  We can draw reasoned inferences that the body – especially of a child – can only take so much abuse without suffering a predictable toll.  But who is there to measure it?   Who tracks the long-range wear and tear on the human organism from being put through the amusement-ride wringer?  We will never get hard data on the invisible dangers – not until the industry allows medics to be positioned at entrances and exits to thrill rides, scanning people's brains before they get on, then once again after they get off. 
           
             So until the science catches up with our concerns – and until we have a national database that keeps statistical tabs on the neurological risks posed by various thrill rides, along with a list of the side effects of habitually or occasionally using them to get an adrenaline fix - what can we do as parents?  
            The first thing is to trust our instincts – our own and those of our children.  If a young child is scared or reluctant to go on a ride, don’t force him.  As children grow older, their peers may be contemptuous of their fondness for kiddie rides.  They may urge them to graduate to big-boy rides – you know, the ones with G forces that make you weak at the knees and knock you into the middle of next week.  This is our cue as parents to step up to the plate.  Children must be taught that bullies don’t always do their work by directly assaulting us with blows.  They sometimes do it by daring us to jump off the roof and let gravity do all the beating up.  

                So the next time we plan on getting our jollies by going through the latest thrill mill, the question to ask ourselves is this.  Are we really so bankrupt of natural ways of having fun that we have to put ourselves through the unnatural strains and stresses of amusement park rides with names like Colossus and Goliath?               
            Isn’t the joy of flying a kite enough?  Must we hold out for the thrill of being buffeted around like a kite in a windstorm?  If children were free to let their imaginations run wild, couldn’t they find ways of feeling at the top of the world without being blasted hundreds of feet into the air?   When it comes right down to it, don’t children already have everything it takes to come fully 100% alive without testing themselves in one death-defying action ride after another?           
            In the end, the only thing that limits our capacity for joy and pleasure is our own imaginations – and our infallible instincts for knowing what is in harmony with our psychobiology - and what stands to do it violence under the guise of having fun. 




Sunday, May 25, 2014


 A DAY IN THE ABUSEMENT PARK  (UNABRIDGED)

                                                               by Neville Raymond

            It was D-Day - the Thursday before Memorial Day, 2014.  Thinking to beat the summer rush, we piled the kids into the car and set out to storm the Magic Kingdom.  Our sons had never been and we looked forward to basking in their pleasure as first-timers.
            A heads up on the parking lot tram.  Its roof seems to have been built for the Seven Dwarves.  Even my wife (who is barely taller than my 12-year old) had to work at not bumping her head.
           
            At the park entrance, we decided to start with California Adventure.  
            Our first choice, Soaring Over California, did not disappoint.  Swooping through majestic panoramas, like the Golden Gate Bridge, snow-covered slopes, and canopies of redwood forests, was a thrill that probably would never be equaled unless we took up hang gliding.  Even then we couldn't cram so many landscapes into a few minutes. 
            Next was Radiators Springs Racers, but within minutes of lining up we got the bad news.  It had suffered a mechanical breakdown – apparently one in a notorious string of such breakdowns.  Deciding not to wait we headed for Disneyland proper.

            Inside the park, our hope of escaping the Memorial weekend crush was dashed. Turns out we had timed our attendance for Grad Day!  The park was swarming with thousands of teens, converging from all sides, laughing and chatting without a care.  Before noon lines for major attractions had ballooned to interminable lengths and even minor attractions had unusually long wait times. 
           
            Suddenly the calculus of pain-pleasure was flipped on its head.  If the average time for inching through lines for major rides is conservatively estimated from 60 to 90 minutes, our day was consumed by at least six hours of doing nothing but twiddling our thumbs and making idle chitchat.  The payoff was a fleeting series of thrills lasting a sum total of 10 minutes, if that!             
            
             600 seconds of thrills to show for 6 hours of wait time!  And that’s on a good day!  Who in their right mind puts up with a cost-benefit ratio this skewed?              
             At intervals along the lines winding in and out of endless roped mazes were trashcans labeled “Waste”.  I fantasized that cans throughout the park were labeled “Wasted Time”.  If visitors dumped their precious hours there, they would overflow with tens of thousands of hours each and every day! 
            If time is money, as they say, what shall we say of a corporation that keeps relentlessly raising ticket prices while lowering the amount of time we can actually spend on enjoying its big-ticket rides?

            But hey, let’s remember we are there for the rides - and forget about how a corporate policy of packing ‘em in takes us for a ride.  If Soaring Over California had been a graceful glider ride on a sunny day, Disneyland's big attractions pride themselves on their ear-splitting stomach-churning bone-jarring bouts of turbulence. 
            As rough-and-tumble rides go Indiana Jones wasn't that bad.  The kids loved it and clamored for more.  Next came Splash Mountain.  My eldest found it a blast.  From a picture taken of us at the moment of the critical drop, my younger son didn’t fare as well.  The camera caught him with his cheeks puffed up.  He was attempting to breathe at the dreaded moment when the coaster goes over the precipice, but only succeeded in filling his cheeks with air!  

            We then switched gears and went for gentler rides.  Jungle Cruise (which showed its age), the twirling teacups at Mad Tea Party, and Snow White’s Scary Adventures.  Peter Pan was a letdown.   I remembered the unforgettable scene from my childhood when the boat sails over a panorama of moonlit London, with the Thames and Big Ben clearly delineated.  This time around the whole scene was virtually blacked out.  It was like being transported back to London during the Blitz!

            At Autopia the kids got a kick out of acting all grow-up, steering cars around an enclosed track.  They insisted on going back a second time. 
            At Matterhorn the line was like a serpent that had swallowed its tail.  Leaving my wife to hold our place, we headed for Big Thunder Mountain Railroad.  By now it was dark, so we didn’t see how overcrowded it was.  After inch-worming around in lines for close to two hours, we were seated on a runaway train that took us through the bowels of a mine at breakneck speed, with special audio and lighting effects that had been upgraded over the years.  My oldest couldn’t get over the mock cave-in and pyrotechnic explosions.  We sat side-by-side and survived the experience exhilarated.

            So far it was just another day at Disneyland.  The mob scene wasn't ideal, the long lines intolerable, but what else is new?  Nothing in all this led me to revise my opinion of amusement parks.  Then something happened that jolted me awake.  And I got to thinking that while theme parks like Disneyland have much to offer in the way of innocuous fun, there is something about them – some Dumbo of an elephant flying around the room - that we avoid talking about.  It was an ah-ha moment that shifted my perception and led me to think that perhaps that “m” in “amusement” park should be replaced with a “b”.  Then we might just see them for what they are – “abusement" parks.  

            As concerned parents, we want to keep our children safe.  Safe from toxic toys.  Safe from street criminals.  Safe from schoolyard bullies.  But then we suffer a momentary lapse in judgment.  We take them to a place where they are grabbed by an enraged giant and shaken like a victim of Shaken Baby Syndrome.  They are hurled into a grudge match with gravity that flattens their young bodies with more G forces than even astronauts endure.  They are jerked and spun around, bounced and twisted as if caught up in the tumble-dry cycle of a mammoth dryer.  They suffer hundred-foot drops and precipitous plunges that leave even adults with the bottom falling out of their stomachs.   
            Most of us wouldn’t treat a dog that way.  And here we are treating our children - who just a few short years ago were babies in arms - in this unhinged, deranged, almost berserk way which, if it were done to a family pet, would be grounds for animal cruelty.   

            We call it a day at Disneyland.  Magic Mountain.  Knott’s Berry Farm.  A socially accepted way of having harmless fun.  Am I the only one that finds this a little crazy, or what?  Parents pride themselves on being sensitive to a child’s feelings.  We practice nonviolent communication with their budding spirits.  And their growing bodies?  Those we allow to be shaken, rattled, jolted and jerked around, hurled and accelerated through 4-Gs, subjected to bone-jarring stresses, head-whipsawing forces and stomach-churning 100-foot drops!

            How can we be conscious parents in so many areas of our children’s lives and yet be so unconscious when it comes to this?  How can we be responsible custodians of young lives and yet allow their bodies to be treated with such shocking disregard?  The human body is an exquisitely sensitive organism.  Trillions of cells intricately organized into muscles, nerves, heart, and brain. Only now are we fathoming the brain injuries that children and adults sustain by recklessly colliding on the football field.  Perhaps it is time to take stock of the bone-jarring, nerve-wracking, brain-crunching violence that children encounter at a place billed as the happiest on earth.   
            Splash Mountain.  Space Mountain.  Matterhorn.

            Matterhorn?  Yes, Matterhorn.  I am a grown man in good health, with no preexisting conditions.  I was stunned by this ride and appalled by how it left me feeling.  
            It seems we had saved the worst for last.  After my wife had spent two hours holding our place, we had to go on Matterhorn.  As a teenager I remembered it as a rather pleasant simulation of a bobsled ride.  Repeated upgrades turned it into a ride I hadn't bargained for.  First there was the off-the-charts bouncing and jouncing from the wheels, scrambling the brains and slamming the spine.  The engineers skimped on the shock absorbers for either sadistic reasons or to save a measly buck.  Then there was a madcap careening through cavernous darkness.  Many times it looked we were going to fly off the mountain only to be jerked around at the last moment and whipsawed back on track.  What had we let ourselves in for?  With mounting dread my heart went out to my youngest.  I couldn’t reach back to comfort him and my voice was lost in the thunderous din.   By the time the ride screeched to a halt, I didn’t just feel upset.  I felt violated.  Vowing to never go again, I wondered how a body could hope to escape unscathed after repeatedly going through something like that.
           
            Attention-grabbing headlines on roller coasters are reserved for accidental deaths from ride malfunctions.  At issue here is something more insidious.  It is the harm done to children’s fragile bodies when a ride functions perfectly, just the way it is supposed to.  It may not be damage visible to the naked eye.  But it is the thousand neurological disturbances that occur when the human organism is strapped into a mechanical device whose sole purpose seems to be to push it to the limits of endurance.  Are we aware of the subtle damage done to brain stems, spines, vital organs?  Forget about obvious symptoms like nausea, headaches and dizzy spells.  Do we test for sub-clinical tears and lesions?  Is anyone monitoring the arrhythmic pattern into which the heart lapses, or the microscopic vessels in the brain that rupture and hemorrhage? 
            No, no one is.  The amusement park industry sees to that.  Its unspoken mission is to foil all legislative efforts at federal oversight.  Even accidents that make the 6 ‘o clock news - of bodies catapulted from seats through a failure of restraint mechanisms or crushed by colliding cars – can't seem to mobilize public opinion in favor of regulation.  Fixed-ride amusement operators have lobbied Congress to remain masters of their domain.  There are no federal guidelines to say that 4-Gs of force is too much – though even trained astronauts are spared that much – or that this accelerative stress point or that level of decelerative strain is pushing it.  It's literally the wild blue sky out there. 

             Yet the body has its own organic limits, even if fixed-ride park operators refuse to abide by any federal ones.  With their eye on boosting attendance, park operators vie to come up with the tallest, fastest, meanest, scariest ride experiences.  Meanwhile, the Annals of Emergency reported that amusement ride-related brain injury had risen substantially since 1990.  Tears notably develop in the inner layers of the carotid and vertebral artery from indirect trauma or torsion of the neck.  Blood surging through these tears can cause the inner and middle layers to separate or dissect.  “The acceleration and abrupt changes in direction on a roller coaster may induce uncontrolled rotation of the head with stretching of the cervical vessels and aorta similar to that observed with acute deceleration in a motor vehicle crash.”   
             From 1996 to 200 injuries on amusement park rides jumped 60 percent.  More than 10,000 injuries needed emergency room treatment, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.  And then there is the anecdotal evidence.  The National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke in Bethesda, MD, reported that almost 60 people suffered brain trauma after being on thrill rides that operated normally.  Eight died.
            And that was back in 2002!  Did it shame park owners into quitting their insane race to come up with action rides that launch even more ferocious assaults on the human body?  Were they guilted into commissioning real-time scientific studies to determine what these thrill rides do to growing bodies?  The New York Times reported that ten years prior to 2002, “there was no such thing as a hypercoaster, a roller coaster that reaches 200 feet or higher. Now, the record is 400 feet. Until a few years ago, roller coasters gained momentum purely by gravity. Now many are catapulted from zero to 70 miles an hour in less than four seconds by motors originally designed to launch rockets.” 
            
           And here we are, twelve years down the road, and the much-hyped changes in rollercoaster design keep on coming.  What about the corresponding changes in heart rate, blood flow, brain chemistry?  They may pose short and long term harm, but they remain out of sight, out of mind.  We don’t know the incidence of memory loss.  We don’t count the many mini-strokes occur.  We don’t calculate the chances of microscopic bleeding in the brain.  Sure we can speculate.  We can draw reasoned inferences that the body – especially of a child – can only take so much abuse without suffering a predictable toll.  But who is there to measure it?   Who tracks the long-range wear and tear on the human organism from being put through the wringer on these rides?  We will never get hard data on the invisible dangers – not until the industry allows medics to be positioned at entrances and exits to thrill rides, scanning people's brains before they get on, then once again after they get off. 
           
          Without before-and-after examinations of brain and body scans, there is no way to detect the internal harm wreaked on the millions who mindlessly queue up hour after hour for a few seconds of thrills.  Only by running a controlled series of neurological tests on site is it possible to quantify the memory loss…brain hemorrhage…arrhythmia of the heart.  Only then can we say with certainty that two rides a month – or a year or ten years or never - is a safe level of exposure on Mind Eraser or Drop of Doom.

            Don’t hold your breath for that to happen anytime soon.  An industry that insists on investigating its own accidents is not about to throw open the doors to men in white coats to come in and rain on its parade.  Next to nothing is known about the prevalence of roller coaster injuries and deaths because the industry - acting on the principle that ignorance is bliss - quashes every bill that would allow the feds to come in and enforce safety inspections and investigations.  And there is no doubt that if they are left to their ever-scarier devices, they will push the envelope until the aneurism bursts. 
            
            So until the science catches up with our concerns – and until we have a national database that keeps statistical tabs on the neurological risks posed by various thrill rides, along with a list of the side effects of habitually or occasionally using them to get an adrenaline fix - what can we do as parents?  
            The first thing is to trust our instincts – our own and those of our children.  If a young child is scared or reluctant to go on a ride, don’t force him.  As children grow older, their peers may be contemptuous of their partiality for kiddie rides.  They may urge them to graduate to the big-boy rides – you know, the ones with G forces that make you weak at the knees and knock you into the middle of next week.  This is our cue as parents to step up to the plate.  Children must be taught that bullies don’t always do their work by directly assaulting us with words and blows – they sometimes do it by pushing us into dangerous situations where we are assaulted by overwhelming forces which no body (let alone a child’s) is equipped to handle – at least, not without traumatizing itself on some level.

            Some people use putdowns like fraidy-cat, which is ironic because if we treated a cat in this way we would have to answer charges of animal cruelty.  They label us killjoys and party-poopers because we get cold feet at the sight of a 400-foot drop or the prospect of 10 inversions.  Let’s remember that a bully doesn’t have to push a child around to hurt him.  He can just push him to jump off the roof on a dare and let gravity do the job.  
            Above all, let’s not forget that counting a newborn baby’s fingers and toes is just for starters.  It is up to us as parents to teach our children to be in awe of our bodies and the intricate, beautiful way they are put together.  As we learn to cherish our bodies, we no longer take for granted the many conventional ways in which we assault them.  Rock concerts are billed as high-energy fun - but high decibel assaults on eardrums cause rapid hearing loss in rock musicians under thirty.  Is the thrill of being blasted at rock and roll concerts worth a lifetime of progressive deafness? 
           
            So the next time we plan on getting our jollies by going through the latest thrill mill, the question to ask ourselves is this.  Are we really so bankrupt of natural ways of having fun that we have to put ourselves through the unnatural strains and stresses of amusement park rides with names like Colossus and Goliath?  Are we so deadened physically that the only way we can enjoy ourselves is to become adrenaline junkies and ritualistically offer up our bodies to be slung around and swung upside down hundreds of feet in the sky at record-breaking rates of acceleration and deceleration? 
           
            Why not make our awareness of the intrinsic dangers of white-knuckle thrills a jumping-off point to return to the innocuous joys of childhood?  Nobody has to buy ever-higher-priced tickets for the delight of squelching their toes in the mud or racing paper boats on a mountain stream.  Or the thrill of toasting marshmallows or watching meteor showers on a summer night.  Or the giggles and guffaws from a game of charades.  

             Isn’t the joy of flying a kite enough?  Must we hold out for the thrill of being buffeted around like a kite in a windstorm?  If children were free to let their imaginations run wild, couldn’t they find ways of feeling at the top of the world without being catapulted hundreds of feet into the air?  Couldn’t they figure out ways to laugh, sing, and be merry without being pinned against their seats by giant machines and spun around inside a metal centrifuge?  When it comes right down to it, don’t children already have everything it takes to come fully 100% alive without testing themselves in one death-defying action ride after another?           
            There is a whole world out there ready to bring a smile to our faces – a squeal of delight to our lips – a light-hearted skip to our steps.  There are natural wonders and mysteries aplenty to make the hairs on the back of our necks stand up.   All we have to do is to raise our sensitivity to the little things in life – and we can make big happy memories indelible enough to last a lifetime!   
            In the end, the only thing that limits our capacity for joy and pleasure is our own imaginations – and our infallible instincts for knowing what is in harmony with our psychobiology - and what stands to do it violence under the guise of having fun. 

Thursday, November 28, 2013

BETTER ONE LONE NUT THAN EN ENTIRE PEOPLE OUT TO GET THEM   [PART II]
                                                                   
                                by Neville Raymond


             Members of dysfunctional families are known to go to any lengths to deny that a respected family member is a child molester or a sexual predator.  It takes courage of the highest order to throw away the tissue of self-serving rationalizations and evasions that stand in our way and look squarely at the evidence that is before one’s eyes.  Certainly it is not for the faint of heart!  It is not for those prone to lying down and going along with the spurious comforts of the status quo!  It is not for those who must have quick fixes and easy solutions to appease a desperate need to cling to a shred of sanity.
            The truth is there is nothing harder than acknowledging that a well-liked or trusted uncle is a child molester.  Unless, perhaps, it is acknowledging that our beloved Uncle Sam – whom we are raised to respect from our high-school civics classes and venerate from our first Veteran's Day or 4th of July parade - is in collusion with the dark forces that are out to rape and ravage and ruin us. 
           
            Honestly now, which one of us hasn’t been tempted to drift on the river of denial?   Imagine your state of mind after your eyes had opened to the mountains of evidence proving that the plot to assassinate President Kennedy was organized at the highest levels of government, banking and industry.  
            Wouldn’t it be one hell of a hair-raising epiphany!                                      
            Wouldn’t the trusted pillars of your world buckle and fall like a row of dominoes?  
            Can you really go back to watching your favorite TV reality show or crime drama after experiencing a bombshell like that?   
            Can you wake up and go back to work the next day as if nothing had happened.
           
             Imagine your state of mind after listening to a briefing that leaves not a shadow of doubt that the World Trade Center was leveled by controlled demolition - that the 19 hijackers were dupes and patsies, like Lee Harvey Oswald - and that the guiding force behind 9-11 was the long arm of the national security state.        
             Would you be able to take a load off and relax and make yourself comfortable, even if it is in your own living room?  
             Or would you be reeling from the fact that the iconic authority figures you trusted and believed in with the naiveté of a child have gone the way of Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy?
           
            If you want the reason why the corporate-owned media has been so successful in bamboozling the American public with preposterous narratives of 9-11 and the JFK assassination, look no further, here it is!  People are scared witless of the implications of finding the invisible government guilty of orchestrating these horrific tragedies.  They are terrified of realizing that they are ruled by a criminal syndicate of high-level sociopaths and homicidal thugs.  
            It doesn’t matter how logical that realization may be.  Everyone knows that politicians lie and cheat where the masses are concerned.  Is it that much of a stretch to believe that they engage in mass murder as well?  
            Evidently not.  But the implications, the implications, the implications of it all!  
            If we really believe that a fire has broken out in the theater of American politics that threatens to devour everyone alive, how are we supposed to stay calm and carry on with business as usual!  Do we go home and pop a can of beer and zone out before our favorite TV sitcom?  Do we curl up into a fetal position and let a pack of lying, cheating, murdering psychopaths turn everything we stand for to ashes in our mouth?  Or do we stand on the street corner or climb to the rooftops and open our mouths like something out of an Edvard Munch painting and scream the horrifying news to the world?   
             
             This is what makes debunking the official government line so challenging!  Once we take on board the realization that the government is no longer to be trusted, it means rethinking everything we have been taught about authority figures.  It means reevaluating our concepts about democracy and capitalism, the greed of the powerful and the needs of the people.   
             And who knows, after all that rethinking and reevaluating, it might even mean that the onus is now on us to take charge, to organize, to blaze a path to recovery.  It might mean that the government of the world is now effectively up to us!  It might mean that there is nothing left but for us to deputize ourselves as leaders in our own right and go out and fill the hideous vacuum created by the moral collapse of our institutional leaders! 
           
            That can be a scary and unsettling proposition for anyone, even the best-equipped and most conscious among us.  What about for Americans who are dumbed down by the school system and drilled to keep their heads down and put their noses to the grindstone of corporate America?  For them it must feel downright crazy and terrifying.  Some of us would do anything to get out of feeling that!  And who can blame them if they do - by going along with the official conspiracy to pooh-pooh so-called conspiracy theories that expose the lawless underbelly of the corporatocracy.                
           The great thing about allowing ourselves to be taken in hook, line, and sinker by official explanations of the JFK assassination and 9-11 is that it lets us off the hook.  It doesn't matter how illogical and ludicrous they might be!  As long as we believe in these outlandish official explanations, we don’t have to rise to the personal challenge of believing in our individual selves and in our collective power to actually do something about it!   
             What though there is a weight of scientific evidence to prove that 9-11 was an inside job and that the JFK assassination could only have been carried out with the full resources and complicity of the national security state?  To dismiss the preponderant weight of this evidence is a small price to pay for relieving ourselves of a more pressing weight – you know, the sheer weight of responsibility of getting off our rear ends and stepping up to the plate and doing whatever needs to be done to create a world that doesn't arrest the fulfillment of our potential as a species by perennially banking on threats of danger to advance the agenda of power. 
           
            At the end of the day, that is the ace in the hole of the anti-conspiracy cabal.  
             That is the chief selling point of a corporate mythology that pooh-poohs the evidence that 9-11 is the Reichstag fire of a newly emergent fascist state and that the JFK assassination is organized at the highest reaches of power.  
              That is the beauty of inoculating the populace against so-called conspiracy theories.  
              As long as we can buy into the party line, we can all forget about mobilizing in a white heat of consensual outrage and tamely retreat into our individual shells.  As long as we believe that Oswald or Osama did it, we can be secretly relieved that we dodged the bullet and go back to binge shopping or binge TV watching and act as though nothing is fundamentally wrong! 
             On the surface, America might seem to be a violence-prone aggression-addled, gun-addicted nation, but there are times when Americans seem to fit the psychological profile of women who love too much.  They would rather put up with those plutocratic bad boys who abuse them silly and betray their trust ten ways to Sunday than face the daunting prospect of dumping their treacherous asses and starting over.  
            Or as the Elvis Presley ballad goes, "I'd rather go on believing your lies than living without you."
            
            If we want to fool ourselves about 9-11 or JFK, that's our prerogative.  But let's not fool ourselves about how tough it can be to see these events for what they really are - a clarion call to throw off our victim status and take charge of our collective destiny.  
            Why not come right out and say it?  It's going to take everything we have to stop putting our blind faith in authority figures who have lied and swindled and slaughtered their way into our hearts throughout history.  It's going to take everything we have, and some things we didn't even think we had in us, to walk away from those who have walked all over us for centuries and wake up to the realization that we are the ones we are waiting for
           Naturally there is some scared part of us that thinks that it might be better to delay that realization as long as humanly possible.  Better still, couldn't we just put it off indefinitely by being good little citizens and swallowing the Big Lie that the system has our best interests at heart? 
            Sure we could.  But for how much longer?   How unbearably hard must it get for us before we decide not to take the easy way out?  Clearly the system is geared towards working for someone’s best interest.  It's sure as hell not ours.  It's theirs!  And come hell or high water, they are determined to keep it that way.                 
            Which is why they would rather give us to believe that the world’s most powerful plutocracy can be brought down by an occasional loser or kook than give us all the reason we need to come together with a common purpose and bring it down en masse


BETTER ONE LONE NUT THAN AN ENTIRE PEOPLE OUT TO GET THEM   [PART I]
                                
                                    by Neville Raymond



           Every time the anniversary of a landmark American tragedy rolls around, they come crawling out of the woodwork - or is it the networks.  The 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination brought them out in droves.  It was quite the seasonal spectacle to behold.  The minions of the mainstream media, swimming upstream against the currents of common sense and logic.  The usual assortment of shills tying themselves into pretzel-like knots over the official explanation of the JFK assassination.  They may as well just grab the country from behind and perform a giant Heimlich maneuver, because this is one pretzel that the American people find it increasingly difficult to swallow without choking. 
           
            Let’s face it.  The plutocrats know the public is on to them.  They know that fewer and fewer people believe their outrageous conspiracy theories.  Lee Harvey Oswald, a known CIA asset, methodically set up to take the fall for a presidential assassination, is trumpeted as the lone shooter.   Steel buildings burn up from a depleted supply of kerosene fuel and pancake down at free-fall speed.  It can only happen in a twilight zone where the laws of physics and logic and common sense are violated on a surreal scale.  And so armies of spinmeisters have to be marched out to shore up the house of cards.
           
            One of the treasured explanations in their little boxed set of fairy tales is the psychological one.  This one takes the cake.  Here are shills who normally wouldn’t give a psychotherapist the time of day, all of a sudden trying to explain America’s mass acceptance of ‘conspiracy theories’ in psychological terms.  Google any article that seeks to explain the mounting level of disbelief in official stories.  Pull down the “Edit” menu and under “Find” insert such words as “scared” and “powerless” – and oh, the all-time biggie, “comfort”.  They are guaranteed to make an appearance in every such mainstream article. 
            The prevailing theory is that these shocking events cause Americans to feel frightened.  A lone nut can bring down a president.  A few crazed hijackers can bring down U.S. landmarks.  This is too scary to contemplate.  And so people grasp at the straws of conspiracy theories in their hunger for meaning and structure.  The idea that these events are staged by invisible powers allays their sense of powerlessness.  It helps them to make sense of the world.  It serves as a much-needed source of comfort.  

             Talk about bending and twisting the psychological truth back on its head.  It is an upside-down position that does a yoga master proud!  Maybe these shills are naïve but anyone with a scintilla of understanding of psychology knows better.   People naturally crave reassurance and comfort during times when assassins and hijackers seem to run the show.  But nothing provides greater reassurance than a narrative that allows the authority figures to assert themselves as the good guys, and convince the rest of us to put ourselves in their capable and protective hands.  Nothing brings greater comfort to a traumatized nation than the notion that the evil that is loose in society is the work of isolated crackpots beyond the pale, against which the forces of law and order are committed to defend us.
           
            But what happens when the good guys we turn to in times of crisis turn out to be the bad guys who are secretly terrorizing us?  Then it is not just a President who gets shot.  The credibility of an entire system of government is shot to pieces.  
            What happens when the orders had to have come from high up to rig the World Trade Center with explosives or shut down an air defense system to give planes a chance to fly off course and crash into U.S. landmarks?  Then it is not just a couple of skyscrapers that blow up.  The prestige and authority of an entire power structure blows up in our faces as spectacularly as the Capitol dome in the trailer for Independence Day!                                                                             
            So-called journalists can allege all day long that conspiracy theories combat a sense of impotence and confusion.[1]  Nothing is calculated to induce a more debilitating anxiety, a more demoralizing sense of despair, betrayal and confusion, than the charge that our public servants are foot soldiers, enforcers and hit men for a criminal conspiracy that is hatched in the highest corridors of power           
           
            That’s why they fight tooth and nail against any suggestion that those who are entrusted with keeping us safe could in any way, shape or form be responsible for terrorizing us.  Our very survival as a civilized society depends upon it!  And that’s why we are determined to idealize our leaders in times of danger and dutifully give them every benefit of doubt, no matter how much evidence piles up to prove their complicity and guilt! 
            In times of crisis, people instinctually home in on a comfort zone that is fortified all around by towering walls of denial.  They desperately want to blame some alien or isolated scapegoat or other for the shocking tragedy.  The last thing they want to believe is that their own leaders could be up to their necks in plots to assassinate their commander-in-chief or massacre three thousand of their own citizens.  Please, please, let it be a ragtag bunch of lone nuts and rogue psychos at work!  We don’t have to know that they flunked their flying lessons or used a rifle that couldn’t shoot straight.   Just so long as we can mop our brows and declare it’s a huge load off our minds.  Just so long as we can all heave a collective sigh of relief, and after an initial period of grief and mourning, go back to business as usual! 
           
            Conspiracies theories in this respect don’t go down easily at all with most people.  In fact, they go against the very grain of our collective need for stability, sanity and social orderliness.  Why on earth should we open ourselves up to the possibility that these shocking tragedies are planned, organized and executed by the national security state?  Do we really want to be confronted by a monstrous evil whose scope knocks the wind out of our sails and demolishes every anchor of our existence!   Are we really such gluttons for punishment that we would want our whole world to come crashing about our ears? 
            Talk about the horror of the abyss staring us in the face!  That is what it is like to believe in a JFK “conspiracy theory”!  That is what it is like to believe that 9-11 was an inside job!  Far from being a source of comfort, we find ourselves at the mercy of a nightmarish evil that rips every shred of comfort from us!  Far from helping us to make sense of the world, it turns our whole world upside down and makes a sweeping mockery of the most cherished principles on which this country was founded!  Far from allowing us to regain a semblance of power, it leaves us squirming in the grip of an Orwellian power that is so fantastic and far-reaching that we have difficulty going to sleep at night!

            Who in his right mind would want that?  Who would deliberately choose to believe a “conspiracy theory” that cuts the ground from under all the hallowed pillars that the American people hold dear?  Wouldn’t it be a lot easier to continue swallowing the anodynes of the official story and go back to enjoy the sleep of the blissfully ignorant and the politically unconscious?  That there is such a swelling groundswell of refusal to go along with that is proof that the American people are made of sterner stuff than we give them credit for!  That as much as two-thirds or even three-fourths of Americans reject the official story speaks volumes on our heroic willingness to confront the unthinkable.  
             Either that or the cover story put out by the corporate media has worn so threadbare over time that its preposterous premises show through at every turn – and you would have to be a mentally challenged pollyanna not to face up to the grim, chilling ugly reality that a government that is sworn to be the protector of the people is really a violent predator of the craziest sort.




[1] Patrik Jonsson, “50 years after JFK, conspiracy theories of all sorts thrive in America”, Christian Science Monitor, November 18, 2013