2 = 2 = 4 IS AN ANTISEMITIC CONSPIRACY THEORY

                                                             Neville Raymond

Has anybody heard of DC Councilman Trayon White?  

https://www.thehour.com/news/article/His-anti-Semitic-remarks-touched-off-an-12779261.php

https://www.vox.com/.../dc-lawmaker-anti-semitism-conspiracy-theory-trayon-white

https://www.washingtonpost.com/...remarks.../529a4f82-2c62-11e8-b0b0-f706877db61...

https://www.haaretz.com › U.S. News

Goggle is awash with the fake outrage and indignation he touched off by warning his constituents to be on guard against Big Money monkeying around with the weather.

All the power-brokers and pundits ganged up on him to force him to eat crow - or given that he is black, perhaps we should say, Jim Crow.

OK.  Before we go working ourselves into a high holy dudgeon, can we at least get our facts straight?

DOCUMENTED FACT #1  

Weather modification has been around for decades.  

Giant weather modification installations like the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska were designed by the government to engineer the weather.  

Even a simple technique like cloud seeding was used as far back as the Vietnam War.  

In April 2016  MIT Technology Review re-published the following statement - “Within the past decade man has had sufficient success with manipulating weather processes to encourage him to press on toward greater and more precise control.”  

And they were quoting a scientist who wrote that in the MIT Technology Review issue of 1969! 

In 2014, the Navy - in the person of David Walker, Deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for science, technology and engineering - publicly confirmed previous conjectures in regards to weather modification and the projected closure of the HAARP facility.  

It is “not an area that we have any need for in the future” and it would not be a good use of Air Force research funds to keep HAARP going. “We’re moving on to other ways of managing the ionosphere, which the HAARP was really designed to do,” he said. “To inject energy into the ionosphere to be able to actually control it.  But that work has been COMPLETED.”

And just a couple of years ago the U.S. government officially provided a “Notice of Intent” on the pages of the Pasadena Star Classified, brazenly announcing their plan to carry out weather modification in Los Angeles County!  

DOCUMENTED FACT #2

Our democracy is a sham because Big Money financiers control our politicians and shape their policies. 

More than a hundred years ago, a famous spokesman for the People’s Party made it crystal-clear: 

“Wall Street owns the country.  It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street and for Wall Street."

A recent Princeton University study found that the average American appears to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact on public policy.  

By the same token, monied interests literally spend billions influencing the government and receive trillions in return.  

In the last five yers, the 200 most politically active corporations in the US spent $5.8 billion influencing our government with lobbying and campaign contributions and got $4.4 trillion in taxpayer support - a return of 750 times their investment!    

So what happens when we put Documented Fact #1 and Documented Fact #2 together?  

We are logically bound to draw this unexceptional conclusion.  

Those who use money to control the laws of the federal government can use the high-tech capabilities available to federal agencies to control the laws of nature that  govern the weather.  

Why, then, is it ridiculous to claim that the biggest financial combine of all - say like the Rothschild/Rockefeller dynasty - can exercise control over what is being done to the weather through the public servants and national security bureaucrats they control, whether directly or indirectly?

Here is the most damning part of the campaign of mockery and vilification directed at DC Council member Trayon White.    

Not a single media outlet took White’s remarks as a cue to open a national dialogue on the scandalous control of our democracy by Wall Street bankers in general, and by trillionaires like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds in particular.

Not a single media outlet took Trayon White’s remarks as a cue to open a national dialogue on the latest developments in the technology of weather modification and what governmental rules and regulations (if any) are in place to guard against their on-going abuse.  

But all of them without exception pounced on the man as being ‘anti-semitic' for saying (gasp!) that the financial powers that be can manipulate our meteorological climate in the same way that they control our political climate.

Now if that isn’t just like saying that 2+2 = 4 is a conspiracy theory!

Or worse, that it is an anti-semitic comment!

Hadn’t we better repent of putting two and two together and run to our Rabbi for absolution?!

HOW THEY HAVE IMMIGRANTS COMING AND GOING 

                                                      

                                                             Neville Raymond

Here is a thought on immigration. 

Every public venue has a lawful occupancy level.  Just like a country.

When a venue gets too crowded and there is danger of exceeding the occupancy level, the fire marshals show up and start asking people to leave.  

What about when a city or state or country gets too crowded?   

Is it lawful for the counterpart of fire marshals to show up and ask people to leave?   

It has nothing to do with Emma Lazarus.  

Or racism.  

Or diversity.  

Or even compassion. 

In the case of public venues, it has to do with a fire hazard.  

In the case of a city or state, it has to do with traffic gridlock, overcrowded schools, swamped court systems and overburdened social services. 

There is only one class of people that is uniquely positioned to make a killing from this criminal state of affairs.  

It is those who orchestrated it in the first place.  

They the ones who created the intolerable conditions in the mother country that dispossessed millions of people from their ancestral lands.   

Who are we going to blame for the surge of Mexican-born immigrants into this country from 4.6 million in 1990 to 12. 6 million in 2009?  

The exodus of 5 million family farmers from Mexico between 1991 and 2007?

Or the influx of U.S. subsidized corn and other products that drove them off their land?

The real villains of the immigration drama are not the innocent border-crossers. 

They are the corporations that wage economic and military wars that turn their countries of origin into uninhabitable wastelands - 

and then turn around and profit from the divisive pool of cheap labor at their disposal.  

This is the narrative that the mainstream media studiously avoids.  

It prints sob stories of immigrants families torn apart, while turning a blind eye to how American families are torn apart by the need to work two and three jobs because they can't make a living wage from one.    

This is the elephantine irony in the newsroom.  

The bloviator in the White House trumpets his anti-immigrant stance while diligently taking his marching orders from the same Wall Street cabal whose trade policies created the immigration debacle in the first place. 

Mr. Moneybags rides into the Oval Office on a wave of nativism and xenophobia, flaunting the banner, Make America Great Again!

And hardly anybody notices that all that immigrant bashing is a popular backlash to the plutocratic plot his cronies hatched to divide and depress America and debase it to a Third World country!    

 It is not a question of immigrants staying or leaving.  

It is how they have immigrants (along with the rest of us) coming and going.  

Here is just one question we should mull over.    

Remember when corporations in the 1990s started including bilingual options in those automated customer service phone messages?

Did you feel all warm and fuzzy at how corporate America was giving the nod to diversity and inclusiveness?

Or did you get chills running up your spine at how the corporatocracy was thinking ahead to how trade deals like NAFTA were going to throw open the floodgates of immigration?